Triablogue has historically been quite Arminianistic in its Calvinism when that seemed more convenient for explaining why they also devote enormous amounts of time, passion, and energy to attacking opposing positions.
But Steve habitually likes to make specious comparisons in order to forge ephemeral feelings about something out of thin air. He knows perfectly well there's all the difference in the world between a belief that God shall bring all rebels to be loyal to Him sooner or later, and a belief that there is no such God. He just doesn't care about that difference, so hey might as well call them twins separated at birth huh!
It would be like me saying that Calvinists like the Triabloguers and New Atheists share this in common: they like to make specious comparisons in order to emotionally masturbate themselves, so really there's no difference worth seriously counting between them -- they're twins separated at birth!
(I would except Paul Manata from that comparison, but I'm not sure he's even involved with TB anymore.
But the other key members there wouldn't care about making such an exception in favor of someone who doesn't behave that way.)