Psychology, Language and Rationality

Discussions pertaining to scripture and theology from a philosophical approach.

Psychology, Language and Rationality

Postby Melchizedek » Fri May 15, 2015 1:39 am

http://www.wired.com/2012/04/language-and-bias/

Reading this article made me consider how the effect of our understanding of words, (vis-a-vis translations, for example) affect our rationality with respect to certain theological positions. I think this has implications for any theological topic such as universalism, where an understanding of the original languages is so key to seeing what is often hidden from us in translations.
Belief doesn't change what is true, it only puts one in line with what is already true.
User avatar
Melchizedek
Moderator
 
Posts: 1751
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.

Re: Psychology, Language and Rationality

Postby maintenanceman » Fri May 15, 2015 3:40 am

Interesting article, and I wonder if that might have something to do with the fact that we seemingly find new ideas with multiple readings of the same scripture passage?

I also think that understanding cultural context (which may go hand in hand with understanding the original language) has much to do with being able to fully grasp what the original writer was saying.
User avatar
maintenanceman
 
Posts: 1257
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 4:22 am

Re: Psychology, Language and Rationality

Postby Holy-Fool-P-Zombie » Fri May 15, 2015 4:48 am

Let me shed some light here. For the record:

    I have a masters in psychology and a six sigma black belt in statistical methodology from Motorola.
    I have a working familiarity with French, Spanish and Portuguese

So this does give me credence to speak as a subject matter expert. While these experiments show initial promise, we really need to wait a bit - to see if the results are replicated and other variables are tested in future experiments. The researchers might be showing a correlation

Correlation is a statistical measure (expressed as a number) that describes the size and direction of a relationship between two or more variables. A correlation between variables, however, does not automatically mean that the change in one variable is the cause of the change in the values of the other variable.

rather than a causation variable
Causation indicates that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; i.e. there is a causal relationship between the two events.

And there could really be other unidentified variables causing the results.

Also, the article doesn't really say what proficiency in the second language the participants had and whether it was measured beforehand via conventional language testing methods.

I would also like to see this expanded to measure different language types and their differences. Let's take western English speakers as our knowledge and testing base. Would romance languages (i.e. French, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish) produce significant differences in regards to Asian languages (i.e. Chinese, Japanese or Korean) or middle Eastern languages (i.e. Arabic)?
Charismatic / Anglo-Orthodox / Holy Fool; Inclusivist / Purgatorial Conditionalist / Nicene Creed / ACNA;
Contemplation (i.e. Mindfulness, Yoga, Zen); Holistic Medicine (i.e. Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Kampo, Traditional, Spiritual);
User avatar
Holy-Fool-P-Zombie
 
Posts: 2751
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:30 pm
Location: Near Chicago or hanging out with Holy Fools, Zombies, P-Zombies, Nerds and Geeks


Return to Philosophical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests