No, I am NOT trolling. We can even substitute a real person. Let’s take Doug Ernest, for example. He has his own blog at douglasernst.blog/. He’s an ex-Army, Republican, Roman Catholic and masters degree holder- in political science. And a very good writer. Suppose he gets a job, with the New York Times. And he writes a story, on the current Republican, health care bill. What happens to his story? How would it get changed or distorted? I want to understand the process, from an individual, reporter’s perspective.
Or, if we are talking philosophy…I want to understand this process, from an existential, phenomenological perspective.
Or pretend I am Curly, of the Three Stooges. Explain it, so that even I can understand it.
Walk me through it